Federal vector search, beyond the demo.

pgvector, OpenSearch k-NN, Milvus, Weaviate, and Pinecone. Production RAG, semantic search, and embedding pipelines engineered for GovCloud and Azure Government.

Overview — why federal vector search is different

Vector databases hit mainstream right as generative AI did, and the federal government has been scrambling to catch up ever since. But "install Pinecone and point a chatbot at it" is not a federal answer. Federal vector systems must respect data boundaries (CUI, ITAR, IL4/IL5), must be auditable (who retrieved what, when, why), must not memorize and leak PII, and must run inside FedRAMP-authorized perimeters. The correct first question is almost never "which vector DB?" — it is "what corpus, what retrieval quality metric, what boundary, what LLM, what user workflow?"

Precision Delivery Federal LLC builds federal vector search and retrieval systems from first principles. We are a SAM.gov registered small business (UEI Y2JVCZXT9HP5, CAGE 1AYQ0, NAICS 541512) with hands-on experience building retrieval pipelines that actually meet agency quality thresholds — not demo notebooks that fall apart on real data.

Our technical stack

LayerPrimaryAlternatesWhen we use it
Vector store (default)pgvector on Aurora PostgreSQLOpenSearch k-NN, Milvus, WeaviateUp to ~10-50M vectors, GovCloud-native.
Vector store (scale)Milvus on EKSQdrant, Vespa100M+ vectors, horizontal scale.
Vector store (hybrid)OpenSearch with k-NNElasticsearch dense_vectorWhen lexical + vector in one index.
Managed / SaaSPinecone FedRAMPWeaviate Cloud GovRarely — boundary-dependent.
Embedding modelsBGE, E5, Nomic EmbedCohere Embed, OpenAI text-embedding-3Open source default; commercial when eval justifies.
RerankerBGE reranker-largeCohere Rerank, ColBERTv2Second-stage ranking for precision.
ANN algorithmHNSWIVF_PQ, DiskANN, ScaNNHNSW by default; IVF_PQ for memory-limited.
ChunkingStructure-aware (Markdown, PDF)Fixed-size, semantic chunkingRespect document semantics.
OrchestrationLlamaIndex, LangGraphHaystack, customLlamaIndex for retrieval; LangGraph for agents.
EvalRagas + custom judge LLMTruLens, DeepEval, PromptfooEnd-to-end + retrieval-specific metrics.

Federal use cases

  • Regulatory document retrieval — e.g., CFR, NIST publications, agency policy libraries.
  • Legal e-discovery assistants — for DOJ, agency OGCs, and GAO.
  • Veteran benefits Q&A — VA-wide benefits encyclopedia retrieval. VA page.
  • Medicare / Medicaid policy retrieval — CMS manual navigation for provider support. HHS page.
  • Procurement intelligence — semantic search across FPDS, SAM, and past-performance corpora.
  • Investigative discovery — semantic search across acquired document collections for the FBI and IGs. FBI page.
  • Technical manual retrieval for maintenance — Army and Navy maintenance manuals surfaced by task. Army page.
  • Grants writing assistance — NIH and NSF grant officers retrieving precedent awards.
  • Immigration case support — adjudicator assistance for USCIS. DHS page.
  • Congressional correspondence — retrieval-assisted response drafting for agency legislative affairs.

Reference architectures

1. pgvector-backed RAG in GovCloud

Documents stored in S3. A chunking and embedding worker (Step Functions + Lambda) processes new uploads, writes chunk text + embedding vector to Aurora PostgreSQL with pgvector. Retrieval service (FastAPI) hits Aurora with a hybrid query — pgvector cosine similarity plus BM25 through a tsvector index — and reranks the top 50 with a local BGE reranker hosted on an ECS GPU task. Generation via Bedrock Claude over an agency-approved endpoint. Audit logs capture (user, query, retrieved chunks, generation, feedback). Everything inherits the FedRAMP High baseline of Aurora + Bedrock.

2. Milvus on EKS for enterprise-scale semantic search

100M+ document chunks across an agency-wide corpus. Milvus cluster on EKS (16 query nodes, 8 data nodes, MinIO for object storage). HNSW indices. Ingest via Kafka from source systems. An OpenSearch sidecar holds BM25 for hybrid. Retrieval hits both stores in parallel and fuses with RRF. GPU rerank via Triton Inference Server.

3. Classified-adjacent on-prem retrieval

For agencies with on-prem retrieval requirements, Milvus on bare-metal Kubernetes with local NVMe; embeddings generated via a locally hosted model server (vLLM + open BGE model). Zero external dependencies. Suitable for disconnected environments.

Delivery methodology

  1. Discovery — corpus survey, representative queries, quality target, boundary and sensitivity classification.
  2. Design — chunking strategy, embedding model shortlist, vector store choice, retrieval topology, LLM choice, security controls.
  3. Build — iterative increments with measurable retrieval quality at each step. Eval harness lands in week 1, not week 10.
  4. Validation — benchmark on held-out queries; adversarial testing for PII leakage and prompt injection.
  5. Operate — monitor drift, add new documents, retrain rerankers, watch failure modes.

Engagement models

  • SBIR Phase I fixed-price — RAG feasibility + quality benchmark.
  • SBIR Phase II fixed-price — production RAG deployment.
  • Fixed-price RAG prototype — capped scope, measurable retrieval quality.
  • T&M retrieval platform — multi-team shared infrastructure.
  • OTA through DIU / AFWERX.
  • Sub to prime.

Maturity model

  • Level 1 — Search: dense vector top-K over static corpus.
  • Level 2 — Hybrid retrieval: dense + sparse + rerank, measurable MRR improvement.
  • Level 3 — Contextual RAG: prompt assembly with citations, end-to-end quality measured.
  • Level 4 — Agentic retrieval: multi-step reasoning, tool-using retrieval, query decomposition.
  • Level 5 — Institutional retrieval: org-wide retrieval layer serving many apps, with retrieval governance, access control, and drift monitoring.

Deliverables catalog

  • Corpus analysis report.
  • Chunking strategy document.
  • Embedding pipeline (IaC + source).
  • Vector store deployment (Terraform + Helm).
  • Retrieval service (FastAPI + OpenAPI spec).
  • Eval harness with labeled benchmark.
  • PII redaction pipeline.
  • Audit logging + dashboards.
  • SSP appendix + control inheritance.
  • Operator runbook.

Technology comparison — honest tradeoffs

StoreStrengthsWeaknessesFederal fit
pgvectorFree, Aurora-native, inherits FedRAMP, SQL-familiar.Single-node throughput, index rebuild pain.Very high — default recommendation.
OpenSearch k-NNHybrid lexical + vector, GovCloud-native.Memory-heavy HNSW, ops complexity.High.
MilvusHorizontal scale, GPU-accelerated, mature HNSW/IVF.Operational overhead on EKS.High at scale.
WeaviateModules ecosystem, hybrid search native.Smaller federal footprint.Medium.
QdrantRust, fast, good filtering.Smaller federal footprint.Medium.
PineconeManaged, serverless, low ops burden.SaaS boundary, FedRAMP moderate only.Low — boundary-limited.
VespaHeavy-duty ranking, structured data.Learning curve.Medium.

Federal compliance mapping

  • AC-3, AC-16 — per-chunk ACLs enforced at retrieval time; retrieved chunks filtered to user clearance / need-to-know.
  • AU-2, AU-12 — every query and retrieved chunk logged with user identity, timestamp, and relevance scores.
  • SI-10, SI-11 — input validation on queries; retrieved content sanitized before LLM handoff to mitigate prompt injection.
  • SC-28 — embeddings at rest encrypted with KMS.
  • PT-3, PT-4 — privacy impact assessment includes embedding memorization risks.

Sample technical approach — CFR retrieval for a regulatory agency

Agency wants staff to ask natural-language questions about a 30,000-page regulatory corpus and receive answers with citations. Existing search: keyword-only SharePoint.

Discovery: corpus analysis shows heavy cross-references, numeric identifiers, and legalese. Representative queries collected from 12 staff across divisions. Quality target: 80 % useful-or-better on a 200-query benchmark.

Design: structure-aware chunking respecting section headings; bge-large-en for embeddings; pgvector on Aurora for storage; hybrid retrieval (vector + BM25 + RRF); BGE reranker on top-50; Bedrock Claude for generation; citations always included.

Build: 10 weeks. Eval harness in week 1. Baseline (dense-only) in week 2. Hybrid in week 4. Reranker in week 6. UI + audit in week 8. Pen test and ATO support weeks 9-10.

Validation: 200-query benchmark shows 72 % useful on baseline, 85 % after hybrid + rerank. PII leak test passes. Production pilot to 50 staff.

Related capabilities, agencies, vehicles, insights

Federal vector search, answered.
Which vector DB for federal?

pgvector on Aurora GovCloud for most workloads. OpenSearch / Milvus / Weaviate for scale. Pinecone rarely due to data boundaries.

What embedding models?

Open-source first: BGE, E5, GTE, Nomic. Commercial (Cohere, OpenAI) where eval justifies and endpoints are agency-approved.

Can vector DBs live in GovCloud / IL5?

Yes. pgvector on Aurora GovCloud, OpenSearch GovCloud, Milvus on EKS in GovCloud / Azure Gov IL5.

Hybrid search?

Yes. Dense + BM25 + RRF is our default. Pure dense loses too much exact-match signal in federal data.

Can you build RAG systems?

Yes. Chunking, embedding, hybrid retrieval, reranking, generation with agency-approved LLMs, evaluation with Ragas.

How do you evaluate retrieval quality?

Labeled benchmark from the agency's own corpus. MRR, NDCG@10, recall@K, task-level success. Eval harness is a first-class deliverable.

Multi-modal embeddings?

Yes. CLIP, SigLIP, Voyage multimodal, Nomic vision, Whisper for audio, ColPali for page-level visual semantics.

PII filtering?

Pre-embedding redaction (Presidio, AWS Comprehend PII), post-retrieval filtering, per-chunk provenance.

Can you migrate between stores?

Yes. Retrieval abstracted behind a typed interface. Migrations are data-copy + index-rebuild exercises.

Pricing?

Fixed-price pilots, T&M platform work, SBIR Phase I/II where applicable.

Often deployed together.
1 business day response

Retrieval that actually retrieves.

Federal vector search and RAG engineering — ready to deliver.

[email protected]
UEI Y2JVCZXT9HP5CAGE 1AYQ0NAICS 541512SAM.GOV ACTIVE